Tangled (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo)
Disney presents a new twist on one of the most hilarious and hair-raising tales ever told. Your whole family will get tangled up in the fun, excitement and adventure of this magical motion picture.
When the kingdom’s most wanted – and most charming – bandit Flynn Rider hides in a mysterious tower, the last thing he expects to find is Rapunzel, a spirited teen with an unlikely superpower – 70 feet of magical golden hair! Together, the unlikely duo sets off on a fantastic journey filled wit
List Price: $ 39.99
Price: $ 16.38
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (2010)
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (2010) / Region 6 DVD / Audio: English, Chinese / Subtitles: English, Chinese / Actors: Ben Barnes, Skandar Keynes, Georgie Henley, Will Poulter / Director: Michael Apted / 133 minutes
9787799128160
Return to the magic and wonder of C. S. Lewis’ epic world in this third installment of the beloved Chronicles of Narnia fantasy-adventure series. When Lucy and Edmund Pensive, along with their cousin Eustace, are swallowed into a painting and
List Price: $ 29.99
Price: $ 19.95
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
Worthy Addition to Disney’s Classic Films,
*contains some spoilery bits*
Tangled, Disney’s version of the oft-refashioned folk tale Rapunzel, is the studio’s 50th animated film and one that is destined for classic status.
The Synopsis:
This latest retelling begins with a tiny piece of sunlight falling to earth and a magical golden flower sprouting where it lands. The flower, and its ability to restore youth, is discovered, used and kept secret by Mother Gothel. When the kingdom’s beloved queen falls ill, a search for the flower (apparently its existence wasn’t *completely* secret) is successfully undertaken and the healing potion brewed from it restores the queen’s health. The flower’s magical abilities are also transferred to the hair of the queen’s unborn child, Rapunzel. When Mother Gothel discovers this and learns that the magical properties are only retained as long as the hair remains uncut, she kidnaps Rapunzel and raises her as her own child. Claiming that she wants to keep Rapunzel safe from a frightening world full of danger and thugs, Mother Gothel locks her away in a remote tower. While her hair (almost a character in and of itself) grows longer and longer, Rapunzel blossoms into a surprisingly well-adjusted young woman and gifted artist who longs to see the world – particularly the mysterious lights that appear in the night sky each year on her birthday.
Enter our amusing narrator, Flynn Rider, a roguish thief who has just stolen a tiara and is on the run from palace guards when he comes across Rapunzel’s tower and takes refuge there. The very competent Rapunzel restrains Flynn, hides the tiara and strikes a bargain with him – she will return the tiara to him if he will agree to take her to see those mysterious lights, which he tells her are floating lanterns. Flynn agrees and the two set off on a rollicking adventure. Pursued now, not only by Maximus – a horse from the palace guard who refuses to give up the chase – but also by a pair of thugs Flynn double-crossed AND Mother Gothel, Flynn and Rapunzel learn to trust each other as they make one narrow escape from their pursuers after another.
Comments:
Tangled is a laugh-out-loud funny family film that will thoroughly entertain both children and adults. The animation is stellar, the story engaging and the pacing excellent, never dragging for a moment. Rapunzel and Flynn are both charming and likeable, making it easy for viewers to root for them. Further, they are surrounded by a terrific supporting cast including tavern thugs with secret dreams and Pascal, Rapunzel’s pet chameleon. But it’s Maximus who truly steals the show. The expressive horse is brave, determined, sometimes petty, and hilarious. Every scene he’s in is solid gold. I would love to see some sort of sequel with Max and Flynn trading quips – particularly since Max doesn’t speak at all and the two still seemed to be doing just that through much of Tangled.
I did have a couple of quibbles, neither of which significantly impacted my enjoyment of the film. First, the colors often seemed a bit too dark to me, rather grayed out. This impression may well have been exacerbated by the 3D glasses. (ETA: A couple of fellow reviewers have commented that they found the colors bright and vibrant when they viewed the film in 2D. It seems likely that my experience may have had more to do with the theater where I saw the film or with the 3D glasses – or a bit of both. This is especially important since I imagine most Amazon costumers will be purchasing this film in 2D. My thanks to Star Fire and Thomas Plotkin for their input – I really appreciate it!) Second, even though I felt they were well performed, the songs were, IMHO, largely under whelming. With the exception of the lovely “I See the Light”, I felt they had neither the excitement of previous Disney showstoppers “Be Our Guest”, “Under the Sea” or “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King” nor the memorable melodies of “Kiss the Girl”, “Beauty and the Beast” or “Circle of Life”.
On the plus side, the film is rich in emotional depth and is blessed with a number of wonderful scenes. My favorite sequence begins with Rapunzel and Flynn entering the village and dancing with the villagers and continues on through their scene on the lake among the floating lanterns. Their happiness in the village, Rapunzel’s sense of wonder (and ours!) while surrounded by the lanterns, the romantic song they sing as they realize they’re attracted to one another and may be falling in love – it’s all perfect. The lantern scene is jaw-droppingly gorgeous – well worth the price of admission on its own and the film’s most effective use of 3D. Another scene that I loved for its poignancy centers on the silent communication between Rapunzel’s parents as they mourn their lost daughter together just before releasing their floating lantern.
I do want to alert parents to one element. The relationship between…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|“Tangled” Review,
The marketing for Tangled was atrocious. It was the sole reason why I originally had no interest in this movie at all, and is why the majority of my friends still have no interest in seeing it. Although Disney’s former attempt to “return to the glory days”, The Princess and the Frog, was moderately well-received by critics, it was considered a financial failure. They marketed it as a warm-hearted Disney musical in the vein of the classics, but apparently the potential audience still wasn’t that interested. Smart ol’ Disney, attempting to learn from their mistakes, decide to go the polar opposite for the Tangled marketing. Bad idea! Now they’ve gotten even less people interested! The marketing made Tangled (even the name gives it a cheesy, “edgy” feel) seem like this super-hip retelling of Rapunzel, full of non-essential gags and devoid of any warmth or heart. If that’s what you think, you’ll be pleasantly surprised if you give Tangled a chance. I bet you didn’t even know it was a musical. It’s a freaking Alan Menken musical! The composer from all of your favorite Disney movies, including Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Little Mermaid composed the songs for Tangled! And he’s still got it! Does that get you excited? Well what if I told you that, contrary to the tone the ads create, Tangled is one of the most touching, beautiful, and joyous movies of the decade? EXCITED NOW?? You should be! Tangled is absolutely PHENOMENAL! It’s easily the strongest Disney movie since Lilo and Stitch (2002). I’d even say that it’s at the very least in my mental ‘top three Disney movies of all time’ list. It’s that good. Forget The Princess and the Frog. Tangled is the true return to what made Disney classics so fantastic and magical. Apparently it didn’t have as much to do with it being hand-drawn as we might have thought.
An old hag finds a magical flower that forever keeps her young. A dying queen’s soldiers find the flower and use it to heal her. The queen gives birth to a daughter, Rapunzel, and the flower’s magic is passed to the girl. Healing power is embedded in the girl’s hair, but is lost when the hair is cut. The old hag steals the girl and locks her in a tower, acting as her protective mother. She continually uses the power of Rapunzel’s hair to stay young. The king, queen and townsfolk set loose lanterns into the night sky every year on Rapunzel’s birthday in honor of the missing princess. I loved everything about Tangled from the moment it started. The serene tone was immediately set and it never let go. It’s just a beautiful movie; rich in emotion and lush in visual splendor. The characters are lovable, the environments are gorgeous, the comedic timing is spot-on, and all tied down into a fantastic Disney package through Alan Menken’s music. This is what it’s all about. Pure Disney magic. Pure joy. I was beaming the entire time. I can’t remember ever having enjoyed myself at a movie this much. I’d say it’s on the verge of perfection if not for one annoyance. The final scenes of the movie have no songs. Characters go into song during the story’s emotional high points, and yet in the end, when everything is climaxing into an emotional finale, we get nothing. I left feeling slightly underwhelmed, because the ending seemed so lackluster in comparison to how emotionally intense Tangled’s other high points felt. I’ve made peace with that gripe, and I’m sure I’ll enjoy it just fine the second time, knowing what’s coming. I just really think the end would have made much more of an impact if one of the key melodies made one last reprise…
The story falters slightly in a few minor places, but as a whole is told quite well. Some small areas include the usual “true love happens overnight” phenomenon that apparently exists in the world of Disney animation. The one area that I was rather disappointed in involved Rapunzel’s relationship with her phony mother. We’re set up with a really thought-provoking dynamic. We know that Mother Gothel’s intentions are purely selfish. I mean she did freaking kidnap the girl and has been lying to her for eighteen years. But we’re shown that there really is genuine affection between the two. Obviously more from Rapunzel’s side, but we still get the impression that Gothel has become quite attached to her pseudo-daughter. I found their relationship really interesting, but as the story unfolded, the focus drew farther and farther away from it and by the time Gothel’s original intentions are revealed to Rapunzel, she has become a simplified villain. An icon. And Rapunzel isn’t torn in the slightest. She instantly goes from viewing her mother as loving, to as a complete witch, and never looks back. So much for all that early character development about how attached they were. I think that the story would come across much more fleshed-out and profound if that dynamic followed through and came around full-circle. I can understand that for a simple story such as…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|*Amazing Disney Film*,
Tangled is an amazing movie! The story is very well written and the pace of the movie never gets boring. Alan Menken’s score is breathtaking! Easily one of my favorite Disney movies of ALL TIME, and I grew up in the second golden age of The Little Mermaid, Aladdin, Beauty And the Beast, ect.
I have seen the movie twice in the theater. I cannot recall EVER going to the see a movie a second time in the theater. I actually might see it again in 3D as it was stunning! Also One of Disney’s best villains in my opinion. The psychological aspect of Mother Gothel is deep.
Don’t miss this new age Disney classic. Perfect for everyone in your family. It will warm your heart, make you laugh and cry and gives you that Disney magic feeling we have been waiting for since Beauty and the Beast! Amazing!!
I cannot wait for this to come out on Blu-Ray. I even thought about getting a 3D tv..Yeah this movie was that good in 3D for me…haha
Was this review helpful to you?
|Another seagoing epic in Lewis’ magical “chronicles”!,
If there’s anything that Walden Media’s CHRONICLES OF NARNIA movie franchise (based on C.S. Lewis’ timeless novels) is known for lately, it could very well be that it ever continued at all. The first film, THE LION, THE WITCH, AND THE WARDROBE, was a box office smash, but successor PRINCE CASPIAN didn’t achieve the same success. But when Disney, who distributed and funded both films, decided not to participate in anymore NARNIA adventures, it seemed as though Lewis’ tales were destined to remain forever frosted by the White Witch. But thankfully, Walden Media refused to let NARNIA die so easily, and so they’ve teamed up with 20th Century Fox to complete the third movie in the series, THE VOYAGE OF THE DAWN TREADER. It could also very well be the last entry; critics have been lukewarm to negative on this film, and faced with so much competition this year from family films such as TRON LEGACY, HARRY POTTER, and even upcoming duds like YOGI BEAR and GULLIVER’S TRAVELS, this film could very well have a hard time finding its audience. Whether the franchise continues or not is ultimately irrelevant, however, because what ultimately counts is that THE VOYAGE OF THE DAWN TREADER is a wonderful way to spend another two hours in the world that Lewis conjured up so many years ago.
I knew it would happen. From the moment the opening titles came across the screen, I could feel the nostalgic magic so prevaliant in the first NARNIA movie seeping in, and it stayed that way for me the whole time. The major difference, of course, is the set-up of the story. Lucy (Georgie Henley) and Edmund Pevensie (Skander Keyes), both approaching adulthood, are staying with their snarky, obnoxious cousin, Eustace (Will Poulter) when they notice a beautiful painting of a fantastical ship sailing on the ocean waters. And of course, the picture comes to life, resulting with the squabbling children washed on the deck of the ship in question, the Dawn Treader, where their old friend, Caspian (Ben Barnes), now a bonafide king, welcomes them. It turns out that Caspian is searching for the seven lords that were banished from Narnia during the reign of his evil uncle. Acompanied by the swashbuckling mouse warrior, Reepicheep (voiced by Simon Pegg), the youngsters travel to various islands across the oceans in search of them. And will Aslan (voiced, once more, by Liam Neeson) be there to help them? You betcha.
In addition to being a seagoing adventure (inevitable since most of the action takes place on the titular vessel), this tale also deals with spiritual matters. Rather than matching wits against an evil menace as with the last two films (although the White Witch does make some brief cameo appearances), the major conflict deals with Lucy, Edmund, Caspian, and especially Eustace, all dealing with their own inner demons. Each island adventure places the quartet through a series of psychological trials that they must overcome. The lands they visit are a strange, yet fascinating lot. There’s the Lost Islands, operated by greedy slavemasters who make fortunes out of auctioning kidnapped people to baddies. Another is seemingly deserted, trippy-looking place that looks as though it could come from ALICE IN WONDERLAND inhabited by invisible creatures as well as a magician (whose book can conjure up all kinds of spells, including one that grants pure beauty). Still others include a cave with a pond that turns everything into gold, a dragon’s treasure horde, an abandoned temple that turns out to be under a spell, and, ultimately, a thick fog of darkness in which one’s worst fears comes alive. It is within these places that each character undergoes some growth. One of my particular favorite scenes involves Lucy wishing she could be as beautiful as her older sister Susan (Anna Popplewell, in a brief cameo), until Aslan admonishes her for stealing the spell from the magician’s book. This is very powerfully depicted through dramatic lighting and emotionally charged acting. At one point, Edmund and Caspian both become jealous of each other when they are tempted by greed, but it’s ultimately Eustace who shows the most growth in the picture.
In the beginning of the film, Eustace is just about what you would expect from Lewis’ text–he’s snobbish, selfish, and condescending, delighting in bullying others while declaring himself superior. He hates his cousins and quickly makes an enemy out of Reepicheep, who, at one point, chastises him for grabbing his most precious attribute: “No one touches the tail!” And just when you’ve had enough of him, he is transformed into a fire-breathing dragon midway through the film. This is where Eustace’s character development really begins, as Reepicheep takes him under his, well, paws, and inspires him to do the right thing. This abovementioned dynamic is the heart of the entire picture, and most of the credit goes to Will Poulter and Simon Pegg for their…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|So what if it’s not exactly like the book!,
Of all the Narnia books “The Voyage of the Dawn Treader” is not an exciting Hollywood adventure. I have read the books many times since I was a child and I have listened to them on audio cd’s. I love them and I love the movies.
I doubt people, these days, are going to sit through a movie based exactly on this book. The book is a series of small self contained adventures with no kind of antagonist present. Its a good read but not much of a Hollywood movie. So they changed it, just like the second movie. Big deal.
There were plenty of advance reviews warning people about this. I have never gone to a movie, based on a book I have read, and expected it to be the same. If it is, great. If not, no big deal, because I go without expectations. It’s much more fun if you leave your expectations at home.
Besides, it’s just a movie. If you can’t deal with the fact that you are going to see someone’s interpretation, other than your own, than don’t go to movies based on books you have read. Or at least check the reviews before you go.
I sure hope some studio gives the “Silver Chair” and “The Last Battle” a go. I’m sure they would be fun to watch.
That’s why I go to the movies.
Was this review helpful to you?
|A Tale With a Different Tail,
Right off the top, if you’re looking for a literal book-to-movie adaptation, you’re going to be very disappointed. Aslan may as well be a tiger. There are countless modifications that did not completely align with the book and numerous subtleties noticeable to anyone familiar with the story.
For the most part, however, TVOTDT stayed true to form, following Lucy (Georgie Henley) and Edmund (Skandar Keynes) – along with their easy to hate cousin Eustace (Will Poulter) – through the fabric of a family painting and into the vast tapestry of the Narnian world created by C.S. Lewis and onto the Dawn Treader (the ship in the painting). Aboard the ship the join forces with recently crowned – a year in Earthly time, and three in Narnia – King Caspian (Ben Barnes) who, along with his crew of sentient beasts and willing sailors, seeks out seven Telmarine lords and swords. Almost immediately after they board the Dawn Treader, and unequivocally after they disembark for their first island excursion, the movie begins to take liberties with the original tale. Speaking of tales…Eustace did NOT spar with Reepicheep; he swung the mouse around by the tail. This sort of misguided subtraction by addition is why many fans of the original storyline could be displeased by this movie. Nonetheless, it’s still a fantasy-adventure tale in which the characters grow and learn from their tribulations.
Acting-wise, everything was professionally done. Actors and voice actors alike were entertaining (Simon Pegg was particularly good as the voice of heroic Reepicheep), but Will Poulter absolutely stole the show as the obnoxious cousin. I’m not sure I’ve ever wanted to punch an animated character before. Maybe Scrappy Doo. Anyway, Poulter is either as pompous and irritating as Eustace in real life, or idiot savant, Rainman brilliant.
CGI is naturally prominent in a movie about talking animals, dragons, and magic. None blew me away like in Avatar or Tron, but considering the target audience the realism presented was, in my opinion, nearly perfect. Scary, but not quite nightmare-worthy. The characters that were supposed to be terrifying (i.e. sea serpent) were shrouded in shadows and those who had redeeming qualities were shown in triumph and sunlight, and ways that capture the audience’s attention.
Considering its engaging story and alignment with Christian allegories, this is a very good movie, an easy recommendation for families, and a worthy addition to the Chronicles of Narnia canon, despite not completely faithful to the book.
For thoroughness, a few of the differences…
MAJOR DIFFERENCES
The addition of the green mist and the sword collection was neither necessary nor a substantive improvement. The extra subplot about a father, and his stowaway child, who joins to save a wife captured by the mist was completely pointless and distractive.
MINOR DIFFERENCES
-Edmund had no big problem with his king-kid-king timeline
-No mention of the Dufflepuds giant foot looking like a mushroom.
-The sea serpent didn’t die; it got tricked
-Eustace attempts steals water, not an orange
-Where is the old dragon that croaks near the water?
-The end mentions nothing about light and water
-The end mentions nothing about a marriage
-There was no prisoner/slave saving; it was a purchase
-Multiple island substories are intertwined and/or out of order
-Lord Bern got married and settled down on Felimath; he didn’t get imprisoned
Was this review helpful to you?
|